Write a 2-3 page paper about outsourcing from the perspective of a Essay

Write a 2-3 page paper about outsourcing from the perspective of a multinational firm (Yes, this may be a hypothetical firm), - Essay Example t saving has been passed on to the customer who has benefited by the fact that even though the costs of raw materials is on the rise, the price of our goods haven’t gone north and the quality of the goods we provide has remained the same over the years and even improved in many cases. Something that the customers have really appreciated and have been complimenting us on time and again. Also with outsourcing we have been able to reduce the time it takes to bring out new products into the market. With people working in different time zones, it is now possible to bring out new products at a faster rate than before. Now our designers can create a design which is sent to the manufacturers who can produce the goods and it can be ready and shipped back to all our stores within weeks. This has meant that whenever a customer purchases a T&T product they are always buying the latest in fashion. Most of our back office operations have been outsourced freeing up valuable resources which would otherwise have been bogged down due such tasks. This has brought in a huge cost saving to the company as well allowing us on to divert our resources and concentrate on many other avenues which would have otherwise would have suffered. But even though outsourcing is seen by many as the fix it all solution for many problems, it comes with its own set of woes, the biggest and by far the toughest to deal with is the people issue. A company’s most precious asset are the people that work there and they are the hardest hit when outsourcing is considered. Since many processes have been outsourced, many workers have been let go which was done with a heavy heart but it was a must. The customer wanted high quality apparel at reasonable costs and the only way to provide it to them without sacrificing on the product was to downsize. Also with our high dependence on the Internet and other such information delivery systems, when a crash occurs things can spiral into chaos as was the recent case

Canterbury Television ( CTV ) building in Christchurch Assignment

Canterbury Television ( CTV ) building in Christchurch - Assignment Example However, none of these earthquakes has caused havoc and loss of lives as did the earthquake of 6.3 on Richer that hit Christchurch on 22 February 2011. This aftershock reportedly claimed 184 lives in the city. However, CTV building was the most affected, something that raised many questions from structural engineers and the public at large. This is because CTV was the only building that collapsed from the earthquake, claiming 115 lives of the 184 people who perished in the entire Christchurch. The collapse of the building has been blamed on human error associated with poor design and construction. Several key-role players and stakeholders have been associated with the incident and its consequences, which this paper seeks to examine. In addition, the paper will analyze the management and organizational factors that might have been associated with the incident. Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Introduction 4 The key role-players 4 The key stakeholders 7 Management and organization al factors associated with the incident 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 10 References 10 Introduction New Zealand is one of the European countries that are very prone to earthquakes. Seismologist attributes this to its proximity to seismic zone. Associated Press (2012) reveals that very powerful earthquakes have hit the country several times in the recent past. ... This is because CTV was the only building that collapsed from the earthquake, claiming 115 lives of the 184 people who perished in the entire Christchurch, according to Associated Press (2012). The commission formed to investigate the matter found out that the building might have collapsed due to poor design and construction. The commission also identified several key role-players and stakeholders that this paper seeks to examine. In addition, the paper will provide an analysis and evaluation of the key management and organizational factors linked to the incident, prior, during, and after the incident. The key role-players Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (2012) report claimed that showed that the CTV building incident on 22 February 2011 was extraordinary. This is after findings showed that the building collapsed from the earthquake due to human error. As earlier stated, an earthquake of magnitude 6.3 hit Christchurch on this fateful day killing 184 people most of whom peris hed from the collapsed CTV building, where 115 people reportedly perished. According to the royal commission report, CTV building collapsed due to poor design and construction. As a result, David Harding, the architect who designed the building becomes the first key-role player to blame for the collapse. Write and Greenhill (2012) reveals that the building did not meet the 1986 building standards when it was constructed. The investigation revealed several structural weaknesses in the design that caused the building to collapse upon being subjected to tension. Vervaeck and Daniell (2012) noted that the CTV building had poorly designed joints between beams and columns. This made the